Friday, July 28, 2006
  Week 2 reflections

An article by A. Hirvela (2006; ELT Journal, 60 (3): 233-241) discusses the problem of computer-mediated communication (CMC) in ESL context (he uses the example of listserv activities [same as blogging, forum/chat or wikking – NZ]: topics and dialogue). The author suggests that CMC plays crucial role and helps domestic and international students in many ESL classes in USA, England and Australia to create special “classroom ecology” that provides network dialogue in TL and encourages students to learn from each other, to use complex TL, to increase students participation in class discussions, to form positive attitude toward TL, to be more open in CMC, to learn in new ways (as apposed to traditional classes) outside of the classroom in real or asynchronous formats. According to the author, listserv activities also help to reduce anxiety among non-native-English-speaking students, as they have enough time to reflect on their posts and do it in their own time and space. There are also some shortcomings of CMC, for instance:
- network access limitation (in some areas);
- discomfort with computer/Internet technology among some students;
- technical problems in general (Internet access, crashing);
- “overposting” anxiety (when there are too many posts/comments in students’ in-boxes”).





Comments:
Thanks. I still think though that teachers should teach rather than leave it up to technology. As we are the only emotinal "species" in this world. And the human "warmth " can't be substituted with anything.
 
I couldn’t agree more. As we discussed this issue last Saturday (workshop2), there are some pros and cons in using CMC in ESL context. The best way, I think, is to look at the CMC as one of those auxiliary teaching tools and to adapt its usage to certain teaching/learning situation. Monitoring is also important. If everybody (including a teacher and students) is happy and comfortable to use it - why not????
-Natasha-
 
Post a Comment



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?